I'm not sure how many people out there in bloggerland are following my posts... but I wanted to use this space to let you all know (even if it's just my mom) that Dave and I at International Alpine Guides (a division of California Alpine Guides) are offering a trekking version of the classic Haute Route this summer, July 10-18.
The Haute Route is a famous route done by backcountry skiers in the winter and spring. It traverses the French and Swiss Alps, traveling from Chamonix to Zermatt, and passing through some of the most spectacular mountainous terrain in the world. We hike through high peaks and passes, dropping down to sleep in Alpine huts and sometimes in little mountain villages, where we have fine French and Swiss meals, drink excellent wine, and explore the world of cheese. That's my favorite part.
I will be guiding the trip, as I am fluent in French and have lived in the French Alps. I am so excited about this trip that I wanted to write about it here, and ask you all to spread the word! If you or someone you know are looking for a grand and scenic adventure this summer, or just some stunning, life-changing mountain vistas, this is one to consider very seriously.
Check out our website for more info: http://www.californiaalpineguides.com/Haute_Route_Trek_.html
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Monday, March 29, 2010
Shevanigans and Bootiny
If I were to characterize the past year of my life, I could sum it all up in these two words: Shevanigans and bootiny.
Not to be negative, by any means. But often the greatest obstacles and hassles are the first things to come to mind when remembering all the events of a year gone by. And if anything, it sure makes you appreciate where you've gotten to, everything you have surmounted.
And it definitely can help you appreciate the small things. Like a car that runs, a roof over your head, and boots that fit. So this is my year-in-review:
Shenanigans + van = shevanigans.
Boots + mutiny = bootiny.
For the full story on the van, refer to my blog post: Sprinter Killer from December 2009. The new engine is still having power issues, and even after visiting two different Dodge dealerships, our local mechanic, and talking to the guy who rebuilt the engine, no one can figure it out. I am learning to appreciate my humble 1985 4Runner more and more every day. It's just simple.
And for my bootiny... I think boot drama comes to every climber at some time or another. Sometimes several times. I have always had good luck with boots, but at the end of last Shasta season, my mountaineering boots decided to seize up and shrink. Ouch. I finally got ahold of a pair of La Sportiva's new Batura, and have been blissfully happy in them since. Boots are our direct interface (the days of hob-nailed boots for glaciers and "stocking-feet" on rock are long gone) with the mountain environment, and it really stinks if it's a poor connection.
But as always, life goes on, things get worked out, and all the while you realize you've been having the time of your life -- if you've let yourself appreciate it.
Here are a few photos from Jim Porter, a part-time professional photographer on our last Advanced Mountaineering Course at Matterhorn Peak. He captured some great smiles, on a day that could remind even the greatest of cynics that we live truly blessed lives.
Enjoy.

On the approach to Matterhorn Peak. Photo by Jim Porter.
Starting the climb into the East Couloir, Matterhorn Peak. Photo by Jim Porter.
Topping out on the East Couloir, Matterhorn Peak. I love this shot. It captures the vast-ness of the mountains, and gives a good idea of the steepness of the climb. Great perspective. Photo by Jim Porter.
My rope team at the summit of Matterhorn Peak. Left to right: Me, Greg, Will (peeking over the top), and Caitlin. Photo by Jim Porter.
And it definitely can help you appreciate the small things. Like a car that runs, a roof over your head, and boots that fit. So this is my year-in-review:
Shenanigans + van = shevanigans.
Boots + mutiny = bootiny.
For the full story on the van, refer to my blog post: Sprinter Killer from December 2009. The new engine is still having power issues, and even after visiting two different Dodge dealerships, our local mechanic, and talking to the guy who rebuilt the engine, no one can figure it out. I am learning to appreciate my humble 1985 4Runner more and more every day. It's just simple.
And for my bootiny... I think boot drama comes to every climber at some time or another. Sometimes several times. I have always had good luck with boots, but at the end of last Shasta season, my mountaineering boots decided to seize up and shrink. Ouch. I finally got ahold of a pair of La Sportiva's new Batura, and have been blissfully happy in them since. Boots are our direct interface (the days of hob-nailed boots for glaciers and "stocking-feet" on rock are long gone) with the mountain environment, and it really stinks if it's a poor connection.
But as always, life goes on, things get worked out, and all the while you realize you've been having the time of your life -- if you've let yourself appreciate it.
Here are a few photos from Jim Porter, a part-time professional photographer on our last Advanced Mountaineering Course at Matterhorn Peak. He captured some great smiles, on a day that could remind even the greatest of cynics that we live truly blessed lives.
Enjoy.
On the approach to Matterhorn Peak. Photo by Jim Porter.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
6 feet under? No, at least 7,000.
Challenging days in the mountains can really test your mental and physical stamina.
Rick and I have been wanting to "go big" for some time now. We've been throwing around ideas: I really want to ski Basin Mountain, and climb the 4th class route to the top; he wants to hit Scheelite Couloir in good conditions; Williamson with the longest ski run in the Sierra Nevada at 8,000ft has been high on the list.
But with a weekend of warm temperatures behind us and a few days of cooler temperatures, we were guessing that the skiing would not be that great. We started looking at the high peaks to the south -- high because the snow might be more well preserved, and south because it might get just warm enough down there to soften up the snow at lower elevations.
Reasonable, but still kind of shooting in the dark. So we decided to look for a peak based on the climbing, not the skiing per-se.
Josh, a ski patroler and avalanche forecaster for the Eastern Sierra Avalanche Center, decided to join us. This rounded out our group demographic quite nicely. Rick is a local ER nurse, and then there's me, a burgeoning mountain guide. A group well-seasoned enough to have matured beyond the ego that often afflicts groups of athletes, and well-equipped in backcountry decision-making tools.
We decided to try Mount Langley -- 14,026ft just to the south of Mt. Whitney. It is the Sierra Nevada's southernmost 14,000ft peak. Clarence King summited it thinking he was summiting Mt. Whitney. Oops. From certain angles, they do look a little alike.
Actually, Mt. Whitney was only a name at the time -- the name of the highest peak once they found it. So this was not it. And it was named Mount Langley.
It is one of the easier 14ers in the summer, with a relatively easy trail right up to the top and only 4,000ft of elevation gain.
Winter is another story. On a scale of 5 in difficulty, it gets a 4 in the Falcon guide. The northeast couloir, our objective, is not too steep, but enough to keep you interested. And from where you have to park below the snowline, it is at least 6,500ft of climbing.
This day, it was about 7,200ft. Big day.
We cruised up the south fork of Tuttle Creek, making great time despite clothes-lining ourselves with the skis protruding from our backs, and making friends with the grabby willow trees.
The alluvial fan below the couloir had been blown over for days, and developed a very slick surface with a thin layer of drifting snow over it -- perfect for slipping and losing a step or two for every five.
We finally reached the base of the couloir, and put the skis on our back again. Perfect boot-packing conditions up the couloir.
And that would be the last time we could use the word "perfect," or anything similar.
The summit was cool and only a little breezy. Obligatory summit photos and register-signing, and the skis were back on the feet.
I opted for the south-facing, less-steep chute off the summit to access the couloir.
Side-slipping was very fast on the ice. I made several downhill kickturns in lieu of making any real turns, and thus keep my speed under control. I was in full-on survival ski-mode.
We all breathed a sigh of relief when we met at the top of the couloir. Now for some decent turns!

Nope!
The snow was packed firm by the wind, and textured into bathtub-sized grooves by the same process.
Chatterchatterchatterscratch! And repeat.
Two turns down. Forty to go. Then we'll be in the alluvial fan. The snow is sure to be better down there.
And it was. Sort of. It lasted less than 10 turns, and we found the ice again.
Indeed, the day had not been warm enough to soften the previously-softened and hardened snow, so it just remained as ice.

But once we got into the trees, we were sure to find some nicely preserved snow in the north-facing trees.
And we did! In pockets barely even big enough to make one turn without hitting the crust again.
It was an exercise in managing the over-the-handlebars sensation as snow conditions rapidly changed, making tight turns, falling-leaf side-slipping (backwards and forwards), and when all-else failed, reverting back to one of the safest and most controlled turns: the stem-christie (otherwise known as the pizza-french-fry turn from when you were 5). Survival skiing at its best.
Or worst?
The best snow we encountered was perhaps the thin, watery stuff at the very end of the day along the trail, in between bouts of dirt and rocks. No joke.
We reached the car (before dark, remarkably) and found the beer we stashed in the nearby snow. Cold beer never tasted so good.
An excellent day, despite how awful it was. We all agreed that we couldn't remember the last time we skied in such horrid snow. Indeed, the only thing consistent about the snow on this day was how consistently terrible it was.
But it was a good experience, and we were stoked to have pulled off such a big day.
As for me, I was just glad to be 7,000 feet under, and not six.
Yes, you were supposed to laugh at that.
***All photos by Josh Feinberg***
Rick and I have been wanting to "go big" for some time now. We've been throwing around ideas: I really want to ski Basin Mountain, and climb the 4th class route to the top; he wants to hit Scheelite Couloir in good conditions; Williamson with the longest ski run in the Sierra Nevada at 8,000ft has been high on the list.
But with a weekend of warm temperatures behind us and a few days of cooler temperatures, we were guessing that the skiing would not be that great. We started looking at the high peaks to the south -- high because the snow might be more well preserved, and south because it might get just warm enough down there to soften up the snow at lower elevations.
Reasonable, but still kind of shooting in the dark. So we decided to look for a peak based on the climbing, not the skiing per-se.
Josh, a ski patroler and avalanche forecaster for the Eastern Sierra Avalanche Center, decided to join us. This rounded out our group demographic quite nicely. Rick is a local ER nurse, and then there's me, a burgeoning mountain guide. A group well-seasoned enough to have matured beyond the ego that often afflicts groups of athletes, and well-equipped in backcountry decision-making tools.
We decided to try Mount Langley -- 14,026ft just to the south of Mt. Whitney. It is the Sierra Nevada's southernmost 14,000ft peak. Clarence King summited it thinking he was summiting Mt. Whitney. Oops. From certain angles, they do look a little alike.

Actually, Mt. Whitney was only a name at the time -- the name of the highest peak once they found it. So this was not it. And it was named Mount Langley.
It is one of the easier 14ers in the summer, with a relatively easy trail right up to the top and only 4,000ft of elevation gain.
Winter is another story. On a scale of 5 in difficulty, it gets a 4 in the Falcon guide. The northeast couloir, our objective, is not too steep, but enough to keep you interested. And from where you have to park below the snowline, it is at least 6,500ft of climbing.
This day, it was about 7,200ft. Big day.
We cruised up the south fork of Tuttle Creek, making great time despite clothes-lining ourselves with the skis protruding from our backs, and making friends with the grabby willow trees.
The alluvial fan below the couloir had been blown over for days, and developed a very slick surface with a thin layer of drifting snow over it -- perfect for slipping and losing a step or two for every five.
We finally reached the base of the couloir, and put the skis on our back again. Perfect boot-packing conditions up the couloir.
And that would be the last time we could use the word "perfect," or anything similar.
The summit was cool and only a little breezy. Obligatory summit photos and register-signing, and the skis were back on the feet.

Side-slipping was very fast on the ice. I made several downhill kickturns in lieu of making any real turns, and thus keep my speed under control. I was in full-on survival ski-mode.
We all breathed a sigh of relief when we met at the top of the couloir. Now for some decent turns!

Nope!
The snow was packed firm by the wind, and textured into bathtub-sized grooves by the same process.
Chatterchatterchatterscratch! And repeat.
Two turns down. Forty to go. Then we'll be in the alluvial fan. The snow is sure to be better down there.
And it was. Sort of. It lasted less than 10 turns, and we found the ice again.
Indeed, the day had not been warm enough to soften the previously-softened and hardened snow, so it just remained as ice.

But once we got into the trees, we were sure to find some nicely preserved snow in the north-facing trees.
And we did! In pockets barely even big enough to make one turn without hitting the crust again.
It was an exercise in managing the over-the-handlebars sensation as snow conditions rapidly changed, making tight turns, falling-leaf side-slipping (backwards and forwards), and when all-else failed, reverting back to one of the safest and most controlled turns: the stem-christie (otherwise known as the pizza-french-fry turn from when you were 5). Survival skiing at its best.
Or worst?
The best snow we encountered was perhaps the thin, watery stuff at the very end of the day along the trail, in between bouts of dirt and rocks. No joke.
We reached the car (before dark, remarkably) and found the beer we stashed in the nearby snow. Cold beer never tasted so good.
An excellent day, despite how awful it was. We all agreed that we couldn't remember the last time we skied in such horrid snow. Indeed, the only thing consistent about the snow on this day was how consistently terrible it was.
But it was a good experience, and we were stoked to have pulled off such a big day.
As for me, I was just glad to be 7,000 feet under, and not six.

***All photos by Josh Feinberg***
Monday, March 22, 2010
Matterhorn Peak -- a successful summit!
My mom has always told me a story of when she was in her twenties, visiting a friend in Switzerland, and they went for a hike around her friend's family's chalet in the Bernese Oberland. The folks they were with insisted upon stopping every 45 minutes to eat, explaining how even on the seemingly mildest of days, weather can change on a dime. And they will be fueled and ready to handle it.
A very wise strategy, whether it be weather around the corner, or a slightly-too-friendly alpine bull. For my mother, it was the latter. Fortunately, she was fueled and energized -- good thing for all the running (and laughing) that ensued.
This has always been one of those stories that drifts into my head when I am talking to groups about pacing and break-taking techniques on summit day. We do not take "rest" breaks, we take "maintenance" breaks. We break often enough to fuel ourselves, but not so frequently to break our rhythm. We keep a slow and steady pace -- as we say, "slow is fast, and fast is safe."
In this way, we are fresh and fueled at every turn, ready for whatever lies ahead.
In the Sierra Nevada, it is rarely weather or bulls. We don't have much of either here. The weather tends to be fairly predictable. I like to call California the "land of idle threats" for how many times I have seen the thunderheads build and produce nothing but great photos and wracked nerves. But mountains are mountains, and every range has its challenges and curveballs.
***
Zeb and I met Caitlin, Greg, Will, Mark and Jim in Bridgeport on a typical brisk morning. We had skied around Matterhorn Peak the day before, so knew we were likely to have agreeable climbing conditions by summit day.
Our first day, we punched out the hike in just under 5 hours -- 4 hours and 57 minutes, if I recall Jim's exact calculation. A good pace into camp, which set us up with extra daylight hours to get some avalanche beacon instruction in.
The second day was skills day. And we covered them all! With excellent weather (for a change), we managed to hold a full and extensive snow school, practicing crampon and ice axe techniques, as well as self-arrest, including the favorite: falling headfirst-backwards! The whole group did excellently, and we saw our chances at summiting increase yet again.
We dug a pit in the snow to talk about avalanches. Zeb has worked on ski patrol at Squaw Valley for 4 years, and has taught avalanche courses. He was able to uncover the mysteries hidden in the layers of snow for us -- and we learned that indeed, we have a very stable snowpack in the Sierra Nevada. Summit chances looking even better.
Last, I set up a top-rope on some 4th class snowy rocks to practice climbing in boots. The last bit of the Matterhorn Peak climb is a couple of short pitches of 4th class rock scrambling. Nothing major, but good to practice climbing in boots. And the group excelled once again. Summit, here we come!
***
We woke at 5am and hit the trail by 6:30am, immediately having to put on crampons to get up the hill just out of camp -- it had firmed up quite a bit overnight on this southeast-facing knoll.
But we made steady progress, and soon attained the ridge at the tarn (where we camp for our summer and fall trips). Here, the snow was soft but just firm enough to be perfect for booting, and before we knew it, we were at the glacial bowl below the peak.
The snow got deeper, and turned into a lovely wind-buff once we reached the east couloir. One of our other guides, Lynette, was on a 2-day climb, and had started up much earlier than us in order to make it all the way back to the trailhead by nightfall. She had already broken trail, and we had a perfect staircase all the way to the top of the couloir. I still owe her a six pack. At least.
We passed Lynette mid-couloir on her way down, thanked her for the stairs, and cruised steadily upward.
We took a nice break at the top of the couloir, soaking in the views, then continued around the backside of the peak to find our path-of-least-resistance. The south side was still holding quite a bit of snow, and the climb looked to be challenging. Zeb and I short-pitched it, climbing up, setting an anchor, and bringing our group up.
It was 1:40pm, and I had set a strict turnaround time of 2:00pm. I topped out on the second short-pitch, and sighted the summit -- this would finally be my first successful summit! I promise, I'm not cursed -- I blame the weather. Not the bulls.
Bulls?
Anyway, we fudged my 2pm turnaround time a bit, now knowing we would make it down relatively quickly with only two short pitches to belay down.
Our groups traveled strong and safe, we soaked in the views, signed the register, and were on our way down in no time.
Spectacular day.
We made it back to camp just as the sun disappeared behind the ridge, and started melting snow for one of our favorite meals: Thanksgiving Dinner.
Yes, that is Thanksgiving Dinner. In the backcountry.
A healthy meal for some healthy appetites.
Thanks for a great summit, "Team Awesome!"
A very wise strategy, whether it be weather around the corner, or a slightly-too-friendly alpine bull. For my mother, it was the latter. Fortunately, she was fueled and energized -- good thing for all the running (and laughing) that ensued.
This has always been one of those stories that drifts into my head when I am talking to groups about pacing and break-taking techniques on summit day. We do not take "rest" breaks, we take "maintenance" breaks. We break often enough to fuel ourselves, but not so frequently to break our rhythm. We keep a slow and steady pace -- as we say, "slow is fast, and fast is safe."
In this way, we are fresh and fueled at every turn, ready for whatever lies ahead.
In the Sierra Nevada, it is rarely weather or bulls. We don't have much of either here. The weather tends to be fairly predictable. I like to call California the "land of idle threats" for how many times I have seen the thunderheads build and produce nothing but great photos and wracked nerves. But mountains are mountains, and every range has its challenges and curveballs.
***
Zeb and I met Caitlin, Greg, Will, Mark and Jim in Bridgeport on a typical brisk morning. We had skied around Matterhorn Peak the day before, so knew we were likely to have agreeable climbing conditions by summit day.
Our first day, we punched out the hike in just under 5 hours -- 4 hours and 57 minutes, if I recall Jim's exact calculation. A good pace into camp, which set us up with extra daylight hours to get some avalanche beacon instruction in.

The second day was skills day. And we covered them all! With excellent weather (for a change), we managed to hold a full and extensive snow school, practicing crampon and ice axe techniques, as well as self-arrest, including the favorite: falling headfirst-backwards! The whole group did excellently, and we saw our chances at summiting increase yet again.

We dug a pit in the snow to talk about avalanches. Zeb has worked on ski patrol at Squaw Valley for 4 years, and has taught avalanche courses. He was able to uncover the mysteries hidden in the layers of snow for us -- and we learned that indeed, we have a very stable snowpack in the Sierra Nevada. Summit chances looking even better.
Last, I set up a top-rope on some 4th class snowy rocks to practice climbing in boots. The last bit of the Matterhorn Peak climb is a couple of short pitches of 4th class rock scrambling. Nothing major, but good to practice climbing in boots. And the group excelled once again. Summit, here we come!
***

But we made steady progress, and soon attained the ridge at the tarn (where we camp for our summer and fall trips). Here, the snow was soft but just firm enough to be perfect for booting, and before we knew it, we were at the glacial bowl below the peak.

We passed Lynette mid-couloir on her way down, thanked her for the stairs, and cruised steadily upward.
We took a nice break at the top of the couloir, soaking in the views, then continued around the backside of the peak to find our path-of-least-resistance. The south side was still holding quite a bit of snow, and the climb looked to be challenging. Zeb and I short-pitched it, climbing up, setting an anchor, and bringing our group up.
It was 1:40pm, and I had set a strict turnaround time of 2:00pm. I topped out on the second short-pitch, and sighted the summit -- this would finally be my first successful summit! I promise, I'm not cursed -- I blame the weather. Not the bulls.
Bulls?
Anyway, we fudged my 2pm turnaround time a bit, now knowing we would make it down relatively quickly with only two short pitches to belay down.
Our groups traveled strong and safe, we soaked in the views, signed the register, and were on our way down in no time.

Spectacular day.
We made it back to camp just as the sun disappeared behind the ridge, and started melting snow for one of our favorite meals: Thanksgiving Dinner.
Yes, that is Thanksgiving Dinner. In the backcountry.
A healthy meal for some healthy appetites.
Thanks for a great summit, "Team Awesome!"
Saturday, March 6, 2010
Advanced Winter Mountain... Shoveling?
What exactly is the essence of Winter Mountaineering?

Mountains, of course; snow and rock; hiking and climbing; weather.
Sound pretty standard? It is! But the one big difference between winter and summer mountaineering expeditions is the weather. Winter Mountaineering could be compared easily to Forrest Gump's box of chocolates.
And I assure you, it's equally as tasty. Leonard will attest to that.
***
I met Leonard, Emma and Nazli in Bridgeport on Thursday, February 25th. They all had some background in mountaineering, and were looking to expand their repertoire of skills in our Advanced Mountaineering Course. The venue: Matterhorn Peak. The Objective: the west couloir.
Thursday was a sparkling clear day, the sun begging for flip-flops. But one foot out the door and my capillaries demanded otherwise. A deceptively bitter cold sinks into the valley around Bridgeport, and is sluggishly slow to leave.
We checked gear, divvied up group equipment, packed it all up again, took it all apart when the guide found more gear to take, and packed up again. Off to Twin Lakes.
The hike in was in the worst conditions I have ever seen here. The snow was heavy and deep, punchy and loose. In a word, exhausting. We made it to camp just as our adjoining Ski Mountaineering group (which Dave was leading) was turning on their headlamps.
Then the work began: building a bomb-proof camp for the huge storm purported to roll in Friday night.
We would have all of Friday for skills and drills, and further camp bomb-proofing.
And a stellar camp did we make! Roofed kitchen, fortress tent spots. Cozy all-around.
And the storm trickled in a little early. Then it lingered a little longer. Our Saturday summit attempt was out due to avalanche concern and, quite simply, too much snow to make any reasonable progress. Skills trump wallowing, so we worked on snow anchoring, belayed (partner) travel techniques, crevasse rescue systems. Just as I set up a top-rope anchor to practice movement on rock in boots and crampons, a squall moved through again, and the rock quickly became too wet to climb. Back to skills.
In conclusion, it was a trip testing our flexibility and ingenuity. We managed to get quite a few instructional moments in-between retreats to the kitchen tent and hot chocolate. Leonard, Emma and Nazli maintained the best of attitudes through some of the gnarliest conditions I've seen here. And we all had a blast.
Nazli has climbed with us before, and I first met her in Yosemite when she came to climb with
one of our other guides, Mark Grundon, who was working for YMS. She makes great Persian food, and is becoming quite the well-rounded climber.
Emma is a Captain in the Marines, and every bit as tough and even-keeled as you would imagine. I was particularly excited, therefore, when she busted out the baby blue Life is Good cap with a pink heart on it. It was a gift, she assured me.
Leonard's self-professed goals were, simply, to get out and push himself. His great attitude and flexibility proved unequivocally that he was, indeed, just happy to be there and learn as much as he could. He liked everything that came out of the kitchen, whether it be crevasse rescue or our backcountry version of Thanksgiving dinner.
And just as the trip started, we walked out in deep powder, under a bright blue sky.
Every chute in sight had at least a small loose-snow avalanche that had slid during the storm, so for good measure, we had our eyes on overdrive watching for any motion as we walked out, steering clear of old debris zones. Things had stabilized significantly overnight, and we saw no slides. Avalanche danger in the maritime snowpack climate of the Sierra Nevada is "fast to rise, fast to fall," very clearly demonstrated for us in this storm.
And we ended our trip plowing through several inches of fresh snow, ducking through the hushed understory of a true winter wonderland.

Mountains, of course; snow and rock; hiking and climbing; weather.
Sound pretty standard? It is! But the one big difference between winter and summer mountaineering expeditions is the weather. Winter Mountaineering could be compared easily to Forrest Gump's box of chocolates.
And I assure you, it's equally as tasty. Leonard will attest to that.
***
I met Leonard, Emma and Nazli in Bridgeport on Thursday, February 25th. They all had some background in mountaineering, and were looking to expand their repertoire of skills in our Advanced Mountaineering Course. The venue: Matterhorn Peak. The Objective: the west couloir.
Thursday was a sparkling clear day, the sun begging for flip-flops. But one foot out the door and my capillaries demanded otherwise. A deceptively bitter cold sinks into the valley around Bridgeport, and is sluggishly slow to leave.
We checked gear, divvied up group equipment, packed it all up again, took it all apart when the guide found more gear to take, and packed up again. Off to Twin Lakes.
The hike in was in the worst conditions I have ever seen here. The snow was heavy and deep, punchy and loose. In a word, exhausting. We made it to camp just as our adjoining Ski Mountaineering group (which Dave was leading) was turning on their headlamps.
Then the work began: building a bomb-proof camp for the huge storm purported to roll in Friday night.
We would have all of Friday for skills and drills, and further camp bomb-proofing.
And a stellar camp did we make! Roofed kitchen, fortress tent spots. Cozy all-around.

And the storm trickled in a little early. Then it lingered a little longer. Our Saturday summit attempt was out due to avalanche concern and, quite simply, too much snow to make any reasonable progress. Skills trump wallowing, so we worked on snow anchoring, belayed (partner) travel techniques, crevasse rescue systems. Just as I set up a top-rope anchor to practice movement on rock in boots and crampons, a squall moved through again, and the rock quickly became too wet to climb. Back to skills.
In conclusion, it was a trip testing our flexibility and ingenuity. We managed to get quite a few instructional moments in-between retreats to the kitchen tent and hot chocolate. Leonard, Emma and Nazli maintained the best of attitudes through some of the gnarliest conditions I've seen here. And we all had a blast.
Nazli has climbed with us before, and I first met her in Yosemite when she came to climb with

Emma is a Captain in the Marines, and every bit as tough and even-keeled as you would imagine. I was particularly excited, therefore, when she busted out the baby blue Life is Good cap with a pink heart on it. It was a gift, she assured me.
Leonard's self-professed goals were, simply, to get out and push himself. His great attitude and flexibility proved unequivocally that he was, indeed, just happy to be there and learn as much as he could. He liked everything that came out of the kitchen, whether it be crevasse rescue or our backcountry version of Thanksgiving dinner.
And just as the trip started, we walked out in deep powder, under a bright blue sky.
Every chute in sight had at least a small loose-snow avalanche that had slid during the storm, so for good measure, we had our eyes on overdrive watching for any motion as we walked out, steering clear of old debris zones. Things had stabilized significantly overnight, and we saw no slides. Avalanche danger in the maritime snowpack climate of the Sierra Nevada is "fast to rise, fast to fall," very clearly demonstrated for us in this storm.
And we ended our trip plowing through several inches of fresh snow, ducking through the hushed understory of a true winter wonderland.
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Intro to Backcountry Ski... Guiding!
I joined Dave this past weekend on an Intro to Backcountry Skiing course he was holding at Pear Lake, in Sequoia National Park. The weather was going to be rolling in, and at first they predicted 1-3 inches: just enough to mess things up. "Dust on crust" does not provide the most exciting of ski conditions.
Gradually, however, the forecast trended worse and worse, which made us hopeful. Several more inches of snowfall would actually give us some good turns!
We met Doug, Chris and Andy at the Wolverton trailhead on Friday morning under a
threatening sky, and after checking gear and talking about skinning techniques, we were on our way up the hill.
We made it to Emerald Lake just in time for one last glimpse of Alta Peak, before it was engulfed by fog -- to be seen only once more peeking out of the clouds on the last day. Visibility would be quite limited the whole weekend, but just enough to be awed by the spectacular peaks and chutes looming above. An extreme skier's paradise, but not our agenda.
The second day, we covered basic avalanche safety, practiced searching for buried "victims" with our beacons, and hammered out the ever-elusive kick-turn. Traversing over to Pear Lake, we found some excellent snow on the north-facing slopes, and got some sweet turns in on the LFP (see previous entry: LFP=Lame Flat Powder).
Pear Lake hosts one of the Sierra Nevada's few backcountry ski huts. We skied down to it and popped inside to check it out. The caretakers, Miles and Jess, were there tending to the fire and keeping it warm and cozy inside for the skiers staying there. It sleeps about 10, and costs $40/night -- but you'd better be lucky and have your whole winter planned out in order to score a spot. They hold a lottery in November for every weekend in the winter, and they fill up fast.
I asked if there were any plans to put in another hut; after all, they promote enjoyment of our natural environment and help to preserve the wilderness by concentrating camper use to the hut. But our wilderness system does not allow any new structures to be built, and upkeep costs must be exorbitant -- something our meager wilderness budget couldn't possibly support.
Use is a delicate issue for our National Parks and Wilderness Areas -- but I can't help but think of all the huts in Europe, how they teach people to appreciate the natural environment, allowing them to live in harmony with nature, and thereby developing a profound respect for their wild lands. This is reflected in their public policy decisions, in their diet, and society's overall health. Think of the French paradox. How can they eat such a high fat diet, smoke, and still be so healthy? Well, I would argue it is in fact because they eat rich foods, but also because they walk. To the metro, to work, back home, and for the pure enjoyment of it in the mountains.
But our wilderness policies focus on keeping people out, further forging a divide between humans and our natural environment. Of course, we don't want overuse to degrade our wild lands to levels beyond repair, such that they are no longer healthy, functioning ecosystems. But a binary solution to a complex issue is wholly inappropriate. "Open or closed" seems to be the management scheme, further dredging the gap between humans and wilderness. A complex issue deserves a complex solution, and with the massive amounts of creative energy at our fingertips in our society, why can't we find a happy middle ground? Our State budget is certainly one problem, but a lack of appreciation is the bigger issue. Our population is growing at staggering rates, and these numbers are reflected in the use of our Parks. Let's go way back to the basics, educate people on the value of our wild lands, and enforce, with a certain conviction, restrictions that have been deeply researched and proven to be of high priority. It does not suffice to lock the gate and simply restrict permits. It is a quick fix that may have further-reaching and more long-term consequences than we can yet recognize. I realize I offer no solution, but with enough thought, I think we are inventive enough to find one that can work for all.
Enough from the soap box.
We managed another lap on our north-facing slope before heading back to camp and holing up for the night as the storm blew in stronger and stronger.
The next day, we started up a west-facing slope, but it proved to still hold a certain crust under the new snowfall, so we headed for a north-east facing slope on the other side of the lake, and managed some stellar, steeper turns in excellent snow, despite the low visibility.
The group excelled on the kick-turns, and acclimated quickly to the variable nature of backcountry skiing. It was a fun, athletic group to ski with -- the guys all had a very healthy respect for the seriousness of skiing in the backcountry.
For me, it was fascinating to see the artistry in ski guiding. Climbing is much simpler -- you must move safely and quickly, keeping out of harm's way at all time. But the nature of skiing forces you into harm's way, and you must learn to manage it. When climbing, you avoid avalanche terrain as much as possible; but the fun part of skiing puts you square in the middle of avalanche terrain, and you must learn to manage the risk -- quickly. Make your assessment of the stability, keep your eyes open to changes, get yourself out there, and have fun.
It is an art unto itself, and one I look forward to learning more of in the years to come.
Gradually, however, the forecast trended worse and worse, which made us hopeful. Several more inches of snowfall would actually give us some good turns!
We met Doug, Chris and Andy at the Wolverton trailhead on Friday morning under a

We made it to Emerald Lake just in time for one last glimpse of Alta Peak, before it was engulfed by fog -- to be seen only once more peeking out of the clouds on the last day. Visibility would be quite limited the whole weekend, but just enough to be awed by the spectacular peaks and chutes looming above. An extreme skier's paradise, but not our agenda.
The second day, we covered basic avalanche safety, practiced searching for buried "victims" with our beacons, and hammered out the ever-elusive kick-turn. Traversing over to Pear Lake, we found some excellent snow on the north-facing slopes, and got some sweet turns in on the LFP (see previous entry: LFP=Lame Flat Powder).

Pear Lake hosts one of the Sierra Nevada's few backcountry ski huts. We skied down to it and popped inside to check it out. The caretakers, Miles and Jess, were there tending to the fire and keeping it warm and cozy inside for the skiers staying there. It sleeps about 10, and costs $40/night -- but you'd better be lucky and have your whole winter planned out in order to score a spot. They hold a lottery in November for every weekend in the winter, and they fill up fast.
I asked if there were any plans to put in another hut; after all, they promote enjoyment of our natural environment and help to preserve the wilderness by concentrating camper use to the hut. But our wilderness system does not allow any new structures to be built, and upkeep costs must be exorbitant -- something our meager wilderness budget couldn't possibly support.

But our wilderness policies focus on keeping people out, further forging a divide between humans and our natural environment. Of course, we don't want overuse to degrade our wild lands to levels beyond repair, such that they are no longer healthy, functioning ecosystems. But a binary solution to a complex issue is wholly inappropriate. "Open or closed" seems to be the management scheme, further dredging the gap between humans and wilderness. A complex issue deserves a complex solution, and with the massive amounts of creative energy at our fingertips in our society, why can't we find a happy middle ground? Our State budget is certainly one problem, but a lack of appreciation is the bigger issue. Our population is growing at staggering rates, and these numbers are reflected in the use of our Parks. Let's go way back to the basics, educate people on the value of our wild lands, and enforce, with a certain conviction, restrictions that have been deeply researched and proven to be of high priority. It does not suffice to lock the gate and simply restrict permits. It is a quick fix that may have further-reaching and more long-term consequences than we can yet recognize. I realize I offer no solution, but with enough thought, I think we are inventive enough to find one that can work for all.
Enough from the soap box.
We managed another lap on our north-facing slope before heading back to camp and holing up for the night as the storm blew in stronger and stronger.
The next day, we started up a west-facing slope, but it proved to still hold a certain crust under the new snowfall, so we headed for a north-east facing slope on the other side of the lake, and managed some stellar, steeper turns in excellent snow, despite the low visibility.

For me, it was fascinating to see the artistry in ski guiding. Climbing is much simpler -- you must move safely and quickly, keeping out of harm's way at all time. But the nature of skiing forces you into harm's way, and you must learn to manage it. When climbing, you avoid avalanche terrain as much as possible; but the fun part of skiing puts you square in the middle of avalanche terrain, and you must learn to manage the risk -- quickly. Make your assessment of the stability, keep your eyes open to changes, get yourself out there, and have fun.
It is an art unto itself, and one I look forward to learning more of in the years to come.
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
LFP

I have long been wanting to take a road trip to Colorado. Through the years, I have encountered many people from the state of fitness. From super strong clients on mountaineering trips to daring skiers on Mexico's volcanoes, Colorado seems to produce a great number of outdoor enthusiasts. And with North America's highest concentration of fourteeners, it is no wonder.
Dave and I joined some friends from Bishop, and a former client (now friend) of mine from Golden, Colorado, for a week of ice climbing in Ouray, and decided to take another week or two afterward (before the winter trips ramp up!) to get some of our own climbing in: professional development, if you will.
The Ouray ice park is a great place to get strong, hone your technical ice climbing skills, and for me, a great place to get some practice leading on ice. But just as with the climbing gym, it soon comes time to move beyond the ice park.
We headed out to Skylight area, a roadside ice "crag" with several multi-pitch ice climbs. It was a beautiful day, so many of the climbs were taken. We spotted a curtain of thick ice on Chockstone Chimney, and headed to the base.

Ice can change dramatically from place-to-place, year-to-year, day-to-day, and even hour-to-hour. The ice we found here was nice, a little less chandelier-like, a little less shattery, but with the top in the sun, quite a bit drippy. A few laps each was enough to wear us out, craving a big meal of pasta and sleep.
After several days of ice climbing, I needed a rest day. Refusing to sit around with ample opportunity for adventure in Colorado, Dave, Rick and I headed up to Red Mountain Pass near Silverton, to go ski some...
LFP = Lame Flat Powder.
Dave was very proud to discover another use for my initials. Ha ha. Ha.
But lame it was NOT! Excellent quality, fluffy soft powder, all under 30 degrees (there was "considerable" avalanche danger reported, which in avi lingo means "natural avalanches possible, human triggered avalanches probable," so we stuck to low-angle snow, least likely to slide).

The snow was so stellar and the terrain so mellow, that we just couldn't stop skiing. For some reason, the mountains in Colorado seem fore-shortened when compared to the Sierra Nevada. That peak in the distance is really only a 30 minute skin-track away. Perhaps it is my eyes that are calibrated to a much larger relief -- in the Sierra Nevada, your trailhead can be at 6000ft and your peak at 14,000ft. In Colorado, you would start at 10,000ft or so.
So we kept going, up and down, up and down... and before I knew it my "rest day" had turned into merely an exchange of muscle groups. And we couldn't have been happier.
Seven days straight of activity, and finally I find

Maybe I should get back to work on that...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)